Kabul/Washington — Former U.S. President Donald Trump has reignited controversy in global security circles by demanding that the United States regain access to Bagram Airbase in Afghanistan — a demand swiftly and firmly rejected by the Taliban government in Kabul. The standoff highlights the enduring geopolitical importance of Afghanistan’s strategic position and its implications for the wider Middle East.
Bagram: A Symbol of U.S. Power in the Region
For nearly two decades, Bagram Airbase served as the nerve center of U.S. military operations in Afghanistan. Located just 40 kilometers north of Kabul, the base functioned not only as a launch pad for combat missions but also as a hub for intelligence gathering and logistics across South and Central Asia.
Its closure in July 2021, during the U.S. withdrawal, was widely seen as the symbolic end of America’s longest war. Trump’s renewed demand signals a recognition of Bagram’s value — not just for counterterrorism, but for projecting U.S. influence in a region now contested by China, Russia, Iran, and Pakistan.
The Taliban’s Firm Rejection
The Taliban government wasted no time in dismissing Trump’s call. A spokesman declared that “Afghanistan is a sovereign nation, and no foreign forces will be allowed to occupy its land again.”
For the Taliban, rejecting U.S. re-entry is not only about sovereignty but also about legitimacy. Any concession to Washington could undermine its credibility among its fighters and regional partners. After years of framing themselves as the victors who expelled foreign troops, allowing America back into Bagram is politically unthinkable.
What It Means for the Middle East
Trump’s demand and the Taliban’s rejection carry ripple effects across the Middle East:
-
Iran: Tehran views any U.S. return to Afghanistan as a direct security threat, given Bagram’s proximity to Iran’s eastern border.
-
China: Beijing, already investing in Afghan resources and infrastructure, would see renewed U.S. presence as an obstacle to its Belt and Road ambitions.
-
Gulf States: Countries like Saudi Arabia and the UAE may quietly support renewed U.S. military presence, seeing it as a check on both Iran and extremist movements.
-
Israel: An American foothold at Bagram would bolster Israel’s security strategy by reinforcing U.S. presence near Iran, a key adversary.
Taliban’s Regional Balancing Act
The Taliban’s rejection also underscores its strategy of balancing between regional powers. By keeping the U.S. out, Kabul reassures Moscow, Beijing, and Tehran, all of whom fear a U.S. military comeback. At the same time, the Taliban hopes to secure investment and recognition by presenting itself as a sovereign power unwilling to bow to Washington.
What Next?
While Trump’s demand is unlikely to materialize, it has already re-opened debates in Washington about America’s strategic retreat from the region. With rising instability in the Middle East and growing alignment between Iran, Russia, and China, Bagram remains a powerful symbol of the U.S. withdrawal — and of opportunities lost.
For Afghanistan, the rejection reaffirms the Taliban’s hardline stance: no return to foreign occupation, even at the cost of strained relations with the West.
Conclusion:
Trump’s call for Bagram’s return highlights a larger geopolitical struggle. To the Taliban, saying “no” reinforces sovereignty and legitimacy; to the U.S., being denied access underscores its waning influence in the region. For the Middle East, it signals a future where regional powers, not Washington, increasingly dictate the balance of power.
